According to Mother Jones, scientists are being sceptical of the recent announcement from Lockheed Martin, promising fusion reactors in as little as a decade, because it "is all theoretical at this stage."
[...]The challenge, essentially, is putting the sun in a box. That box, in theory, is packed full of charged particles, moving at great speeds, constrained by a strong magnetic field that enhances the probability that the particles slam into each other. With enough pressure, the particles stop resisting, and finally fuse, let off an amazing amount of energy.
The problem, says Reed, is that usually it takes just as much energy to power that controlling magnetic field as the power you get from fusion, hence the current size of the reactors. Lockheed claims to be able to harness that energy at a more efficient rate, so it can then make the reactors smaller.
|Simple Eye Grown Out of Stem Cells|
|Why Asparagus Makes Your Pee Smell|
|"We took a rat apart and rebuilt it as a jellyfish."|
|Science Uses Puppets and Babies to Prove Humans Are Generally Good|
|Study: People Make Better Long Term Decisions When They Really, REALLY Have to Pee|
|Fake Name Generator|
|“Are the puppets coming for our jobs?”|
|“Research that could engineer dinosaurs back into existence within the next five to 10 years.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|“A man-powered machine that creates scarfs in 5 minutes.”|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|Google Map Shows You the Most Photographed Areas of the World|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|“The only thing worse than assuming that carbon removal will save the day is assuming it will save the day.”|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|
|“A machine meant to hurl rockets into space.”|
|What Computers See When They Watch a Movie|