Intelligence Gathering Should Never Be a Role for Private Companies

#Privacy

Thu, Nov 27th, 2014 11:00 by capnasty NEWS

In response to intelligence agencies claiming that internet companies are a "safe haven for terrorists" because they do not identify and report threats, TechFruit counter argues that unless a warrant is provided, social media sites should not be expected to spy on their users.

[...] before any criminal or terrorist act has been committed, neither Facebook nor any other communications company should be actively monitoring any users unless issued with a judge-sanctioned warrant. If the police or intelligence services are unable to obtain a warrant because their evidence is too speculative, then it is certainly not for private companies to spy on their users.

The intelligence agencies generally do a good job of protecting the British public from terror attacks, and their actions in doing so should be commended – but when they have an intelligence failure, as in the case of Rigby’s murder, then they should accept the blame. [...]

  1278

 

You may also be interested in:

Costs of Prism Compliance for Google and Others Paid by the NSA
Facebook to Provide Users' Private Info to Government in Exchange for Legal Immunity
"Kids using 'Hello Barbie' won't only be talking to a doll, they'll be talking directly to a toy conglomerate whose only interest in them is financial."
How on Facebook Everyone Can Have Your Private Phone Number
Tech Companies' Requests to Disclose Surveillance Denied by U.S. Department of Justice