In Defense of Flogging

#Opinion

Wed, Apr 27th, 2011 21:00 by capnasty NEWS

Peter Moskos of The Chronicle thinks that the American prison system is broken and argues in favour for a return to corporal punishment:

If you were sentenced to five years in prison but had the option of receiving lashes instead, what would you choose? You would probably pick flogging. Wouldn't we all?

I propose we give convicts the choice of the lash at the rate of two lashes per year of incarceration. One cannot reasonably argue that merely offering this choice is somehow cruel, especially when the status quo of incarceration remains an option. Prison means losing a part of your life and everything you care for. Compared with this, flogging is just a few very painful strokes on the backside. And it's over in a few minutes. Often, and often very quickly, those who said flogging is too cruel to even consider suddenly say that flogging isn't cruel enough. Personally, I believe that literally ripping skin from the human body is cruel. Even Singapore limits the lash to 24 strokes out of concern for the criminal's survival. Now, flogging may be too harsh, or it may be too soft, but it really can't be both.

  842

 

You may also be interested in:

Der Spiegel: “[The Newtown shooting] was no uncontrollable natural disaster.”
A Paper Against Intellectual Property
"Guilt is our inner police force, but if we give it too much emotional power, we risk turning into a police state."
Iowa: Not a Bunch of Kneejerk Revolutionaries
"Killing is always wrong, but in war, it is necessary. How could something be both immoral and necessary?" (via @tkudo)