In this opinion piece in The New York Times, Paul Krugman believes that with the issue of inequality being front-page in the news thanks to Occupy Wall Street and a report by the Congressional Budget Office which documented "a sharp decline in the share of total income going to lower- and middle-income Americans," obfuscators will try to "bring back the blur" by spreading false information.
The budget office report tells us that essentially all of the upward redistribution of income away from the bottom 80 percent has gone to the highest-income 1 percent of Americans. That is, the protesters who portray themselves as representing the interests of the 99 percent have it basically right, and the pundits solemnly assuring them that it's really about education, not the gains of a small elite, have it completely wrong.
If anything, the protesters are setting the cutoff too low. The recent budget office report doesn't look inside the top 1 percent, but an earlier report, which only went up to 2005, found that almost two-thirds of the rising share of the top percentile in income actually went to the top 0.1 percent -- the richest thousandth of Americans, who saw their real incomes rise more than 400 percent over the period from 1979 to 2005.
|The 12 Biggest Ripoffs in America You're Well Acquainted With|
|Complete List of How Many Wall Street CEOs Went to Jail for the Financial Crisis|
|The Money Tree: What Happens When You Attach 100 Banknotes to a Tree|
|Who Your Facebook Friends Are Could Change Your Credit Rating|
|18 Brilliant Inventions Suppressed in the Name of Corporate Profiteering|
|Fake Name Generator|
|“Are the puppets coming for our jobs?”|
|“Research that could engineer dinosaurs back into existence within the next five to 10 years.”|
|Japanese Robot Serves Ice Cream From Inside a Vending Machine|
|How to Avoid Jury Duty|
|“A man-powered machine that creates scarfs in 5 minutes.”|
|Google Map Shows You the Most Photographed Areas of the World|
|“A machine meant to hurl rockets into space.”|
|“The only thing worse than assuming that carbon removal will save the day is assuming it will save the day.”|
|What Computers See When They Watch a Movie|
|The (Very Scary) People of Public Transit|
|CaptchaTweet: Write Tweets in Captcha Form|