"Money is inevitably a tool of the state." A Prediction on Bitcoin's Failure

#Money

Thu, Nov 28th, 2013 20:00 by capnasty NEWS

On The New York Times' DealB%k section, Edward Hadas opines that Bitcoin's attempt at privatizing money will fail because "money that is not issued by governments is always doomed to failure."

Bitcoin relies on thoroughly contemporary technology. It consists of computer-generated tokens, with sophisticated algorithms guaranteeing the anonymity, transparency and integrity of transactions. But the monetary philosophy behind this web-based phenomenon can be traced back to one of the oldest theories of money.

Economists have long declared that currencies are essentially a tool to increase the efficiency of barter, which they consider the foundation of all organized economic activity. In this view, money is a convenient instrument used by individuals to get things done. It is not inherently part of the apparatus of government.

I think of the concept of privately issued tender as “right money,” because the whole idea appeals instinctively to right-wing thinkers. They dislike centralized authority of all sorts, including monetary authority. For example, Friedrich Hayek, Margaret Thatcher’s favorite economist, proposed replacing the state’s monopoly on legal tender with competing currencies offered by rival banks.

  894

 

You may also be interested in:

"Instead of building hospitals, why don't we just give poor people money?"
Where Has All the Money in the World Gone?
In Praise of Canada's Boring Banking System
Finally: the United States' Debt Limit Explained
"It is the simplicity of Seinfeld that makes it so appropriate for use in economics courses."