"To reject the notion of expertise, and to replace it with a sanctimonious insistence that every person has a right to his or her own opinion, is silly."

#Opinion

Mon, Jan 20th, 2014 20:00 by capnasty NEWS

In The Federalist, Tom Nichols laments the death of expertise, "a Google-fueled, Wikipedia-based, blog-sodden collapse of any division between professionals and laymen, students and teachers, knowers and wonderers — in other words, between those of any achievement in an area and those with none at all."

By this, I do not mean the death of actual expertise, the knowledge of specific things that sets some people apart from others in various areas. There will always be doctors, lawyers, engineers, and other specialists in various fields. Rather, what I fear has died is any acknowledgement of expertise as anything that should alter our thoughts or change the way we live.This is a very bad thing. Yes, it’s true that experts can make mistakes, as disasters from thalidomide to the Challenger explosion tragically remind us. But mostly, experts have a pretty good batting average compared to laymen: doctors, whatever their errors, seem to do better with most illnesses than faith healers or your Aunt Ginny and her special chicken gut poultice. To reject the notion of expertise, and to replace it with a sanctimonious insistence that every person has a right to his or her own opinion, is silly.

  852

 

You may also be interested in:

"Who says more antiquated things about women and families, Christian fundamentalists or Islamic fundamentalists?"
The Truth Is, Nobody Cares About Your Blog...
"If the medical profession used research the way police use research, we’d still be using leeches."
All Citizens Have An Obligation to Violate Copyright Law
Tiger Woods and the Destruction of Personal Privacy